Multi-tenant telemetry architecture for MSPs and MSSPs
Vendor-agnostic architects who review your environment, recommend the right platforms, then design, implement, and run multi-tenant pipelines. You get per-tenant routing and isolation, ingest cost control, and managed governance across Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Datadog, and Cribl.
What problems do MSPs and MSSPs hit with multi-tenant telemetry?
Every provider running security and observability for multiple clients hits the same four structural problems. They are architectural, not settings you can flip. A vendor-neutral control layer in front of each tenant stack is what solves them.
Margin Erosion
Telemetry and SIEM cost scales with client count while flat-rate billing absorbs the increase. Every new tenant compresses margins. Splunk renewals commonly carry around 9% annual uplift, so the gap widens each year.
Multi-Tenancy Gaps
Several platforms lack deep native multi-tenant routing, so isolation falls back to separate instances or per-client workarounds. A vendor-neutral control layer gives you per-tenant routing and isolation in one place.
Onboarding Friction
Each new client means architecture work, parsing, and validation across whichever platforms that tenant runs. Without a shared control layer, the work repeats from scratch every time.
Platform Sprawl
Different clients run different stacks, so your team carries expertise across Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Datadog, and Cribl at once. A control layer in front of all of them gives you one routing model.
How does the engagement work?
We follow one lifecycle. Review, recommend, implement, migrate, then optimize. Every phase has defined deliverables, measurable outcomes, and a clear scope boundary, and it starts with a free architecture review.
Architecture Review
We start with a review of your multi-tenant environment, the platforms in play across your client base, and where ingest and license cost concentrates. The review is free and it ends with a written recommendation, not a sales pitch.
- Environment and ingestion assessment per tenant (GB per day, stack, routing)
- Platform fit analysis across Splunk, Sentinel, Datadog, and Cribl
- Highest-impact cost and isolation findings
- Written recommendation with honest pros and cons
Design and Recommend
We design the control layer and tiering model, then recommend the platform mix that fits each tenant. We give you the honest pros and cons and you choose. We are vendor-agnostic, so the recommendation follows the environment, not a quota.
- Complete data source inventory across all tenants
- License exposure modeling per platform and per tenant
- Control layer, tiering, and routing blueprint
- Per-tenant isolation and cost attribution design
Implement and Migrate
We build the production pipelines, per-tenant routing, and isolation, then run migrations in parallel with the live stack and cut over by changing a route. Zbigniew Gajuk has led this work at Fortune 500 scale across 100+ countries.
- Multi-source routing and enrichment, built at config-level depth
- Per-tenant pipeline isolation and tagging
- Replay architecture for compliance support and investigation
- Parallel-run validation and routing-change cutover
Optimize
Once the control layer is live, we run ongoing governance. Quarterly reviews tune routing rules, onboard new tenants, track cost targets, and keep the architecture current as your client base grows.
- Quarterly pipeline performance reviews
- Routing rule tuning for new data sources and tenants
- Cost monitoring and target tracking
- Architecture evolution as your client base scales
Explore by use case
Ready to protect your margins?
Book a free architecture review. We will show you where ingest cost and per-tenant isolation gaps sit, and recommend the platform mix that fits your client base. Your number depends on your environment.
Schedule a Discovery Call